Climate Change is actually about going all-nuclear

Nuclear investors are eliminating fossil-fuel competition by forcing us to underwrite our conversion to all-electric infrastructure

The coming generation of small reactors

So far, everyone seems to have failed to realize the real motive behind the Climate Change farce. I’m surprised it’s taken so long. How could there be so much money behind something so ridiculous? How could anyone be benefitting from all this?

I’ll keep it short:

• The Climate Change farce is driven by the nuclear industry, which plans to introduce a new generation of reactors soon.
  

• To reverse our decades-long reactor moratorium, the industry must overcome the irrational fears of reactor disasters that we've held since the 1970s.
  

• To change public perception, the industry has contrived the “Climate Change” farce, which, to the clueless layman, makes fossil fuels seem even more dangerous than nuclear reactors.
  

• To create a market for these new reactors, the nuclear industry must demolish its competition, namely all our working coal and natural gas plants, which are already meeting our energy needs. And in the name of other claimed environmental concerns, states are now eliminating reactor competition by (ironically) destroying already-built dams.
  

• Since reactors produce usable output only as electricity, the nuclear industry must artificially induce us to eliminate cars, appliances, and other devices that run on other fuels, forcing us to pay for their replacement with electrical equivalents.
  

• To produce the additional power needed to run this new wave of electrical devices until the new reactors come on line, the reactor industry has foisted upon the public the idea that our future lies in windmills and solar farms.

Via its government influence, the nuclear industry is compelling us to pay for an infrastructure overhaul that will eliminate its competition. The industry incentivizes its government operatives (at every level) to destroy our already-working fossil fuel systems and replace them with all-electric infrastructure. This involves creating new legislation making it illegal to operate or manufacture fossil-fuel devices, thereby requiring the public to pay for the changes needed to enrich the nuclear investors:

• Industries must vastly improve energy storage devices, particularly electric batteries, to make it possible to effectively use electricity to power portable devices. Consumers of these devices must pay that R&D cost.
  

• Municipalities must increase taxes to force a now-willing, frightened public to rip out all its working fossil-fuel infrastructure and replace it with electrical infrastructure.
  

• A whole generation of investors has been suckered into financing the construction of windmills and solar farms.

Once the nuclear industry pushes through the legislation that will make its new reactors legal, the following will happen:

• We will all be massively poorer after having paid the unfathomable cost of pointlessly replacing our working fossil-fuel infrastructure.
  

• Those who invested in windmills and solar farms (including the $50K one you just installed on your roof) will see the values of their investments drop to zero.
  

• Nuclear-industry investors will be unfathomably rich.

See, that wasn't hard, was it?

==== ADDENDUM OF 3/24/24:

Using Government to Eliminate Your Competition

If you consider above analysis to be a stretch, consider that in the world of big business:

• It is much easier to force your competition out of business than to sell your inferior competing products into an already-saturated market.
  

• You destroy your competition (at the start of your market entry) by having the government regulate your competition out of existence - by making your competition’s products either illegal or prohibitively expensive.
  

• You don’t need to pay for the astronomical infrastructure changes needed to accommodate your new products; instead you have the government either force or terrify the public into paying for them.

Before you can expect the government to do your bidding, you must form a fascistic relationship with one government party. This explains big business’ increasingly cozy relationship with Democrats, i.e. the party of rules and regulations. Democrats are much better partners for fascistic enterprises because:

• Democrats run a massive social-justice hoax that convinces their voters that Democrats’ rules and regulations exist to serve humanitarian causes, and consequently
  

• Democrat voters are likely to believe that new regulations passed by Democrats are for the common good.

Hence we have Democrats passing “Climate Change” regulations to eliminate fossil-fuel competition for the nuclear industry, which would otherwise languish trying to sell a more expensive and more dangerous product into an already saturated energy market, all while Democrat voters believe that Democrats are saving the planet.

Here’s another example from an entirely different industry:

The Recession just hit McDonalds

The presenter here says he doesn’t understand why the California legislature would put fast-food workers into their own separate category that gets a $20 minimum wage while everyone else gets $16, so I’ll help him out.

Big Tech is located mostly in California, and Big Tech controls the California legislature (and increasingly Democrat legislatures everywhere). Big Tech has obviously decided, together with McDonald's management, that it is going to fully automate all McDonald's locations nationwide. To force the franchisees to demand automation, CA Democrats are driving up labor costs precisely for the purpose of making automation an essential alternative to human labor, which provides better service and which, until the minimum-wage hike, was more cost efficient. No doubt (while nobody is noticing) McDonald’s is getting tax breaks to help fund its store conversions, which means the public is paying for them.

Part of the evidence here is the gaslighting in the media: “Have it your way!” says the article cheerfully, ironically borrowing competitor Burger King’s most famous slogan. "McDonald’s has now taken the initiative to make the lives of their customers easier and more convenient by introducing technology-driven solutions." Fully automated stores, you see, are for customer convenience. Formerly you could place your verbal order with a human who knew enough to guide you through your options; now you must instead interact with the monstrously complicated and ever-changing user interface of a kiosk or phone-app, often requiring many frustrating minutes of your time. But it's all for your convenience.

Yup. If we say it often enough, sheep that you are, we know you'll come to believe it.

What’s even more amazing is that California’s Democratic voters actually believe that their leaders specifically raised California’s fast-food minimum wage to an unpayable level in order to help out the workers rather than to get them all fired. I guess you just can’t fix stupid.

See the difference?