The VP Debate was a Giant Lie of Omission
Things that weren’t said were more important than those that were
Viewers who watched the Vance/Walz debate hoping for an illustration of the differences between the candidates’ platforms were sorely disappointed. This was by design, of course, and sadly much of the responsibility lies with Vance and the Republicans.
The debate presented a deceptive picture of the candidates being rather similar. This was achieved by avoiding topics and answers that would have illustrated the true, radical differences. The acts of omission fall into two categories:
things that Vance could have said but didn’t, and
things that CBS didn’t bother asking.
Omission is the cleverest form of deception: the victim can’t know what’s missing unless he knew what was there in the first place. Being largely clueless due to their viewing habits, CBS’ viewers can’t even grasp that they’ve been robbed.
What Vance Didn’t Discuss
Republicans understand that the public is now so heavily brainwashed on certain issues that it is politically dangerous to discuss the truth. Vance, seeking political expediency, chose not to contest Walz on these. It does not bode well for the republic that we have reached the point where our electorate is so deluded that political figures can no longer discuss reality publicly. The operative question for Republicans is how they’ve allowed things to get to this point.
Elections
Nobody knows who won the 2020 election, and anyone who claims to know is either a fool or a fraud, for several reasons:
the irregularities during that election were too massive for anyone to dismiss, yet they’ve been dismissed;
Biden’s “victory” violated too many historical election norms to be believable;
and first and foremost: our election laws and procedures are now designed to make unlimited election fraud undetectable.
To discuss the undetectable-fraud issue requires a whole set of articles, so here they are:
It takes a special kind of stupidity to imagine that millions of ballots can be honestly distributed, filled out and collected without the slightest shred of supervision under a structure which, by design, cannot be audited. This kind of naivete is almost beyond comprehension, but Democrats have succeeded in selling it to the brain-dead USA, because it is now the norm here: Seventeen Mail-In-Voting Security Vulnerabilities
No, a voting machine does NOT need to be connected to the Internet or to a crook in order to cheat. Further, has it ever occurred to anyone that HAND-COUNTED VOTES WERE AUTOMATICALLY AUDITED and MACHINE-COUNTED VOTES ARE NOT? How is it that nobody seems to have noticed this? You Can NEVER Trust a Voting Machine … because you can never know what its software is doing
Case in point for Tim Walz’ state: Minnesota Elections are a Farce: Only a fool could imagine they're not rigged
For dessert, you might try this:
The talking heads of our two major parties would have you believe that ranked-choice voting gives you more choices, but it's really about eliminating third parties entirely. How can a third party ever grow to power when all of its votes in all its initial elections get swept into the coffers of the two major parties? What Ranked-Choice Voting is really about
Democrats in particular have quite the scam going: they “win” elections on the basis of a system that has been designed to make election fraud literally undetectable no matter how much you investigate it (because the system inherently eradicates all evidence), and then they justify their wins on the basis that little or no fraud was detected.
To his credit, when Vance was asked to declare the winner of the 2020 election, he turned the question around: he began to discuss the underlying issue, namely whether the federal government’s censorship mechanism will permit us to debate the integrity of our elections. Unfortunately it was all too little, too late, and even more unfortunately the connection between the question and his answer flew well over the head of the Average Joe.
Child Care
The beneficiaries of having both parents of every family in the workforce are:
corporations, especially large ones, and
government.
Corporations and government both get a larger employee base. Corporations get more revenues from more sales driven by the additional business-necessitated purchases of these additional workers, and government gets to tax both their employment and their purchases.
The big losers of this movement are children, who would much prefer the constant company of their parents, particularly their mothers, to anything else.
The primary effect on two-income parents is to take the fruits of what they could produce for their own families at home (without purchases or taxes) and put them into the pockets of corporations and government. Nowhere is this more evident than in the area of child care, where a mom staying home could provide for her children without the assistance and attendant taxation of corporate surrogates.
The second effect is to psychologically damage almost all our children by ripping them away from their mothers, whose attention they desperately crave and need, and putting them into the care of a stream of corporate strangers. There is no way to accurately measure the cost of this psychological damage, but I’d guess that we have a lot of deranged criminals running around due to their realizing, at the core of their souls, that their parents never cared enough about them to spend time with them.
The ”child care” industry has a simple solution of course, which is to normalize parent/child separation to the point where anyone who complains about dragging desperate children away from their mothers is regarded as an idiot. Here, for example, is the advice of the NAEYC (an industry association) on how to fix your little problem: Rocking and Rolling: Difficult Goodbyes Supporting Toddlers Who Are Coping with Separation Anxiety. Never does it occur to anyone, it seems, that perhaps separating desperate infants and toddlers from their mothers is not a good idea.
Since both parties are beholden to huge corporate and government interests, I doubt that we’ll see anyone talking sense here any time soon.
Climate Change
Democrats are fond of saying that Donald Trump is the most dangerous person walking the earth. I beg to differ. My candidate is Bill Gates, who is in a race with Elon Musk to become the world’s first trillionaire. Gates has enormous investments in both the pharmaceutical and nuclear industries, and so Gates and his fellow investors have enormous incentives to subvert the academic community, control the mainstream media narrative, and to censor the American public. Few people understand the extent of this.
The problem with nuclear power is that it’s non-competitive in most energy markets for two reasons:
due to prior accidents, the public is hysterically afraid of nuclear reactors, and
nuclear plants deliver power only in the form of electricity, so before they can replace existing fossil-fuel sources, we’d have to build an almost entirely new national energy infrastructure and replace all non-electrically-powered devices with electrical ones.
Even Bill Gates can’t afford to replace our entire energy infrastructure with one that will accommodate his all-electric future, so instead he must terrorize the population into believing that “fossil fuels” are more dangerous than his nuclear reactors. Hence the Climate Change farce. Read and weep:
"Understanding Climate Change - 97% of scientists agree with whoever is funding them"
You can actually look for yourself - using the government's own data and tools: "Rising Oceans - Not"
Gates and the nuclear industry have co-opted essentially all of academia, including the academics at NASA and NOAA, into preaching his rising-temperatures farce. It’s to the point where the disparities between the reality and the claims are becoming so preposterous that they cannot maintain the charade. But no matter: the average fool in the street has no idea how to investigate the truth of this matter, and in an election, it is the average fool in the street that matters.
During the debate, Walz made several vague allusions to Trump’s giving tax breaks to billionaires. We can be assured that the billionaires forcing counterproductive, radical changes upon us at a cost of thousands annually to most U.S. taxpayers couldn’t find a more dedicated stooge than Tim Walz.
Vance knew that he couldn’t openly proclaim the falsehood of Climate Change. This Big Lie is so big that one simply can’t discuss the truth in public without being proclaimed a lunatic by people who know absolutely nothing about temperatures or ocean levels. He should have known he’d be hit with this when deciding on whether to participate in this debate.
Abortion
The amazing thing about abortion is that you can’t get any Democrats to say even one word about why anyone would NOT want an abortion. The reason, of course, is that abortion is the killing of a human being: two people walk into an abortion clinic, and only one walks out. What’s amazing about the Democrats is that they’ve managed to control the narrative on this patently obvious subject to the point where nobody is allowed to discuss the patently obvious.
Unlike with their Climate Change farce, you don’t need to look at much data to understand what an abortion is. If you need some help in this area, here are some former abortionists talking in detail about what they used to do:
All you need to do when someone asks your opinion on abortion is to say “WhatIsAbortion.com” or “AbortionProcedures.com” (both direct you to the same site). But nobody, including Republicans, seems to do it.
Democrats always defend abortion-on-demand for everyone by talking about rape and incest victims and medical emergencies such as ectopic pregnancies. Republicans never seem to respond with the reality, which is that over 98% of all abortions are performed for the sake of someone’s convenience:
I have never heard a Republican politician bring up the fact that in these elective abortions, the person whose convenience is being served is not the mother. Many if not most women are forced or coerced into abortions against their will by abusive husbands, boyfriends, or pimps. Strangely, Republicans never mention that abortion is a necessity of massive industries (human trafficking, prostitution, porn) that exist for the purpose of abusing their women “performers”.
On those rare occasions where Republicans dare to bring up the horror of murdering children in the womb, they focus on third-trimester and post-abortion horrors. Democrats respond by claiming that these are rare or nonexistent. Republicans neglect to mention that highly-common second-trimester abortions are live dismemberments of a living baby:
How can it be that the Average Joe has no idea what’s really happening on the abortion table? It is a testimony to the psychopathy of our media that all of this is not widely known.
Even crazier is that the Democrats, who claim to be the party of “science” believe with all their hearts that the humanity of an unborn baby is determined by whether its mother (or whoever ushers the mother into the abortion clinic) wants it. Even pharmaceutical companies refer to an unborn child as a “baby” when issuing warnings about their products’ side-effects on pregnant women. Here, for example, is the FDA referring (in its sub-heading) to a 20-week fetus as a “baby”:
The sub-head reads, “NSAIDs may cause rare kidney problems in unborn babies”. But gosh, get that mom into the abortionist’s office, and suddenly it’s not a “baby” any more. “In this house we believe that science is real”, I guess. It would be hysterical if it weren’t so horrific.
We are living amidst the largest holocaust in the history of the human race, Democrats are the avid perpetrators, and Republicans don’t have the courage to discuss the details, which are readily available online for anyone to see. How can this be?
Gun Control
The uncomfortable reality that we’re not allowed to discuss here is:
Blacks commit proportionally more crime than any other racial group.
Blacks commit more murder than any other racial group.
Blacks mostly murder other Blacks, and most often they use guns to do it.
Blacks are nine times more likely to kill Whites than vice-versa.
If you’re uncomfortable with these statements, check out the FBI crime statistics. Or to get the idea more visually, you could check out the 2023 NYC murder statistics:
This reality does not sit well with Democrats, who run much of their social justice hoax on the basis of their imaginary world in which crazed White people are chasing Blacks down the streets, using them for target practice. So here we have another Big Lie that has been so thoroughly promoted by Democrats and their media that Vance simply couldn’t speak the truth about why we have a problem with “guns”. Both Vance and Walz seemed to marvel at the low murder rates in Finland, without discussing the most obvious difference. Well, yes, clearly Finland doesn’t have our “gun” problem; Finland’s corresponding murder statistics probably resemble the third bar in the graph above.
Illegal Immigration
There are two obvious problems with a person who advocates for illegal immigration, which are that the person is:
advocating for breaking the law, and
obscuring the fact that illegal aliens are brought here for the purpose of exploiting them in ways that U.S. citizens cannot be.
The obvious question for a person or a party who advocates for the continuous, ongoing violation of one of our laws is: What other laws do you feel that you can conveniently disobey whenever it suits you? Do you feel the same way about election fraud? Perjury? Murder?
Democrats, of course, defend their lawlessness using the excuse of humanitarianism. As Walz claimed during the debate, decent human beings are expected to violate laws that interfere with kindness. But if this is the case, then why haven’t Democrats changed these nasty laws to accommodate the legitimate interests of people who want to be here and who are wanted here?
The reason is that U.S. employers who hire these millions of newcomers don’t want them to be here humanely, which is to say, legally. They want their employees to live under the constant fear of deportation, making them easy to underpay and otherwise abuse. Read:
Since both Republicans and Democrats are complicit in this abuse with their industry supporters in their respective states, we shouldn’t be expecting Vance or anyone else to be talking about the realities of illegal aliens anytime soon.
What CBS Didn’t Ask
Tim Walz’ catastrophic failures and absurdities as governor of Minnesota are legendary there, at least among sane people. No wonder CBS chose to exclude them entirely. As the moderators said as they were talking over Vance when he tried to refute one of their broken promises (i.e. “fact checks”): We have so much to get to!
Indeed.
COVID
Walz, like so many Democrats, briefly alluded to Trump’s supposed mismanagement of the COVID debacle, and like so many Democrats he didn’t bother to elaborate on what, precisely, Trump should or could have done differently. Like all Democrats, Walz measures Biden’s supposed economic growth by measuring the comeback that we’ve made since the depths of the COVID lockdowns.
Fortunately we have no problem understanding precisely how Walz mismanaged the COVID response in Minnesota. Here is former MN Senate majority leader Paul Gazelka to describe Walz’ hysterical over-reaction:
Former Minnesota Senate Majority Leader Paul Gazelka publishes new book on Walz
To get some idea of what it was like to own a small Minnesota business under Walz’ COVID tyranny, watch this:
It is hard to imagine the tyranny that Walz would unleash upon all of us as VP. He will doubtless ensure that the dictates of super-national organizations like the World Health Organization reign supreme here, and doubtless the pharmaceutical industry is licking its chops at the prospect of having a willing stooge in the White House, forcing their will upon each and every American. Like other Democrats, Walz talks about medical freedom only when it applies to women killing their own babies.
If Walz as VP ever gets the chance to preside over another medical emergency, you can be assured that he will grab every shred of power he can amass to himself, and that he will inflict one tyranny after another on the entire U.S. population. Don’t be fooled by the pleasant face he displayed during the debate: based on his record in Minnesota, I doubt that we could find a more dedicated foot soldier for global tyrants than Tim Walz.
BLM’s Race War
Tim Walz presided over the destruction of Minneapolis during the “Black Lives Matter” riots of 2020, waiting days before responding to the mayor’s desperate plea to bring in the National Guard, while seemingly cracking jokes about what sort of staff the Guard might provide. In case you haven’t seen the dozens of photos of Minneapolis burning while Walz fiddled, search on the phrase “Minneapolis burning 2020” (without the quotes) and peruse the Images tab. There you’ll see just a tiny fraction of the damage that the mainstream media would not show you while insisting that the BLM riots were a peaceful protest. Minneapolis alone sustained an estimated $500 million in damage – the second-costliest civil disturbance in U.S. history behind the 1992 riots in Los Angeles.
Here, former MN Senate majority leader Paul Gazelka describes Walz’ unfathomable incompetence in dealing with emergency; watch the brief embedded “X” clip:
Former Minnesota Senate leader on Walz’s riot response: ‘He was frozen’
Can you imagine Harris cackling and Walz cracking jokes in the White House when China invades Taiwan? What about when Chinese missiles are heading straight for the U.S. mainland? No doubt our foreign enemies are licking their chops at the prospect of our ultimate downfall under the “leadership” of these two.
Transgenderism
Somehow this topic never came up during the debate. How could this be?
The above are quite literally the proud, public faces of the Biden administration, and if you think this is nuts, there’s little doubt that Harris will double down. Rather than belabor this, I’ll just refer you to an article:
Democrats are destroying us by forcing everyone to kowtow to the ridiculous: "The Transgender Emperor"
‘Nuff said.
DEI
Somehow, the CBS moderators did not see fit to mention what is arguably the centerpiece of the Biden/Harris administration’s domestic policy, namely Diversity, Equity and Inclusion. In an environment where Democrats have injected anti-White race hatred into almost every aspect of American public life, this is astounding.
I could devote another article as long as this one to this topic alone, but instead, I’ll simply ask that you find a way to watch the movie, “Am I Racist?”. At this writing, the movie, which cost $3 million to make, has grossed $11 million. If it’s not still in theaters by the time you read this, it’ll be streaming online. More than anything I’ve seen or read, this movie captures the diabolical lunacy that is the heartbeat of the Democratic Party.
Education
Even by the admission of Tim Walz’ very good friends at Minnesota Public Radio, “Minnesota is one of the worst states in the country for education achievement gaps”. As of 2021, Minneapolis Public Schools were spending $26,000 per student to produce some of the most abysmal results in the nation. This from a governor who promises a bright future under his future administration. How bright can your future be when you cannot read, write, or do basic math? Who does Governor Tim Walz think he is kidding? Oops wait, I know. Most of Minnesota’s public school graduates are probably ignorant enough to fall for him.
Criminal or just criminally incompetent?
Minnesota government agencies have been under Democrat Party leadership since 2009. In 2018, the year Tim Walz first became governor, a mysterious organization called Feeding Our Future (FOF) appeared and started winning federal contracts awarded through the Minnesota Department of Education (MDE). The purpose of these contracts was to provide meals to thousands of Minnesota public school students. Rather than farm these contracts out to some reputable large-scale food service vendors with solid track records, the MDE incredibly awarded them to FOF, whose MO was to enlist small, mostly Somali-owned groceries and restaurants to provide the food. Each of these tiny places was perhaps capable of providing a few dozen meals daily. The whole idea is so preposterous that it beggars the imagination.
Over the course of four years, the MDE ultimately awarded over $250 million to FOF. Somehow, during Walz’ entire first four-year term, nobody in the Walz administration noticed that these thousands of meals weren’t being served – not Walz, not the MDE, not Walz’ Antifa-loving MN Attorney General Keith Ellison. In fact, nobody in Minnesota ever prosecuted anyone from FOF; only the federal government has pursued prosecutions; so far it has five convictions out of 47 charged, most of whom are still awaiting trial. Most of the $250 million has never been found.
It is inconceivable to me that this gaggle of foreign persons managed to pull this off. Any small business person knows how hard it is to win even a $1 million contract, much less $250 million. My favorite theory is that FOF is an inside job designed to funnel federal money into the coffers of Minnesota’s Democratic Party. That’s why “nobody” knows where most of the money is and why “nobody” in Minnesota was aware of the scam or prosecuted anyone.
Possibly the most frightening thing about a coming Harris/Walz administration is the likelihood that Walz will bring Keith Ellison along and install him as the U.S. Attorney General.
Both Minnesota AG Keith (above left) and his son Jeremiah (above right), who sits on the Minneapolis City Council, have publicly posted their allegiance or at least sympathy to Antifa, a terrorist organization that is believed to be behind the burning of much of Minneapolis in 2020. It is hard to even grasp the notion of an anti-American terrorist sympathizer being the U.S. Attorney General. If Keith Ellison was our current federal AG, we can be pretty sure that no federal prosecutions of FOF would ever have occurred, just as under his state vigilance no state prosecutions have occurred.
Our Diabolical Mainstream Media
I must hand it to CBS and the Democrats: they pulled it off beautifully, once again. There is so much wrong with Tim Walz that it’s hard to even summarize it in a single article, but somehow all of it remained firmly out of sight during 90 minutes of debate.
You’d think Republicans would eventually figure it out, but they don’t: you can’t win a war by playing your enemy’s game on your enemy’s turf by your enemy’s rules enforced by your enemy’s referees:
The network’s choice of debate questions alone is always enough to defeat the Republican – most especially, the choice of which questions not to ask.
Debate hosts know that Republicans will look bad when dodging questions where speaking the truth to a deluded audience would be political suicide.
Debate hosts will not play by their own rules. Despite promising not to “fact check” Vance, the CBS moderators surreptitiously did so by expressly alluding to the “facts” that Biden (unquestionably) “won” the 2020 election and that rising temperatures are the consensus of climate “scientists”.
Playing nice with the media by falling into their traps is not going to win any elections. Every mainstream media debate is a vehicle for pushing Democrats to victory. You’d think that Republicans would eventually figure it out, but I’m not holding my breath.
